|
THE KING OF SCOTS KEEPS CHRISTMAS 1160
Ten miles north of what was shortly to become the
village of Strathmiglo, in the town of Perth,
Scotland, it is Christmas, 1160. The citizens cannot
point out today the place where King Malcom came for
Christmas, for it has long ago fallen into dust, but
the King is here this night, with attendants and
guests, for the Christmas holiday. (His itinerary,
fortunately preserved and of record, shows him at
Perth for Christmas, 1160.)
Malcolm IV, "boy king of Scotland", who
ascended the throne at 12, is 19 tonight, and this
year has greatly increased his stature both as man
and as King of Scots. For one thing, he defeated
Somerled, the Argyle rebel, whose plotting with
McHeth was to unseat the King, and he has defeated
this alliance not with words, but by force of arms.
Fergus, Lord of Galloway, whose ambition and
comtempt for the youth of the King, led his army
against Malcolm this year, and had another serious
trial for young Malcolm: twice he invaded Galloway,
and was twiced repelled. He made a third effort,
overcame his enemies in battle, and forced them to
ask for peace. Fergus submitted his son Uchtred to
Malcolm as a hostage, and he entered the abby of
Holyrood as monk.
Somerled is at this gathering, to give his young
King a renewed pledge of allegiance. Grandfather
David I, whom he succeeded, would be proud of him
this night! And so the spirit of the gathering is
one of relaxation, of satisfaction, of looking
forward to better times, and the whole is tinged
with gaiety.
In the gathering this night is Ada, the King's
half sister, and Duncan, Earl of Fife; and in the
King's pocket is a dowery grant for land....a great
deal of good land....and so what better time for the
marriage than in this pleasant and convivial
atmosphere.
And so on this Christmas night, 1160, a radiant
Ada, and a young Duncan, bearded and looking 10
years younger than his 23, dagger in belt which he
did not remove either in presence of Abbott or King,
took their vows; and when it was over, Ada had
become Countess de Fyfe. The King then presented the
dowery grant. It was probably little larger than
this copy, and differed from it only in a small
ribbon under a blob of pink wax, into which Malcolm
had pressed his seal. I do not think that either
Duncan or Ada had any previous idea of the actual
extent of these lands. Malcolm had probably sworn
the witnesses to strict secrecy until the Christmas
gathering.
Falkland Forest, alone, was then 9,000 acres,
heavily timbered and teeming with game. Strathmiglo
(valley of the Miglo River), Raithellet, Kings
Kettle, and as if this were not enough, Strathbran
(valley of the Bran River in Perthshire). With the
exception of the forest of Falkland, the rest of the
acreage was gently rolling wheat land.
When Ada's Arms were granted, we cannot be sure
-- quite possibly at the wedding, or shortly after;
a shock of wheat portrayed the character of the
lands, its base the Coronet, marking relationship to
Malcolm IV. Duncan already bore the Arms of his
ancestors, the rampant red lion on a gold field.
(Be not hasty as you read. Think well on all
these things; review, consider. It is only in this
way that these early times and these ancient people
take form in the mind of today. The ceaseless
rolling on of years -- of centuries -- must be
thought about. Remember that the year of this
marriage, it will still be 330 years before Columbus
will sail.)
From this alliance of Ada and Duncan, formed by
marriage on this night, 1160, has come a family
surmane which, by God's good grace, has not only
preserved it's orgin's, but has endured for close
upon a thousand years! Don L. Cash -- Amended Jan.
24, 1976)
THE DOWERY CHARTER
Grants to Duncan, Earl of Fife, and his heirs
born of his wife , Ada, the Kings "nepto",
Strathmiglo, Falkland, Rathillet, Strathbraan, and
the whole ferm of (King's) Kettle, to be held in
frank marriage. Edinburgh. (20 November 1160, to 13
September 1162).
The latin in script is difficult to read.
The Charter was issued between the above dates,
derived after checking witnesses. "Comiti"
or "Comes": latin for Earl.
One hardly needs an English translation to follow
the above Charter: Malcolm, by the Grace of God,
King of Scots, addresses his abbots, earls, barons,
justices, ministers, and his French, English and
Scots subjects, and confirms ownership to Earl
Duncan and wife Ada, his "nepto" of the
lands of Strathmiglo, Falkland, Rathillet,
Strathbran,and Kings Kettle, in 'liberum maritagium',
or frank marriage, or for the benefit of their
heirs. He details that the forests, water, game,
fish, crops, etc. go with the land.
This Charter is especially interesting in that it
seems to be the first granted in Scotland 'for the
benefit of heirs', i.e., its ownership may be deeded
to heirs in perpetuity, as long as heirs exist. This
indicates a much broader base for property ownership
than had existed in the dark ages, and indicates
that Scotland in 1160 is beginning to come out of
the dark centuries of feudal lordship, and into the
light of reason and equity.
It is interesting to note that only one of these
16 witnesses had assumed a surname at this time,
Richard Cumin. In all others, identity is to their
occupation, office, parentage or place of residence.
The orginal of this Charter has perished, evidently,
as it has not re-appeared in Europe after 1604. Of
the 161 Acts of Malcolm IV, only 29 still survive as
orginals. The accompanying photograph is of the only
known transcript, preserved in the Harleian
Cartulary by the British Museum, London.
This transcript was made by Sir James Balfour,
who was Lord Lyon King of Arms of Scotland from 1630
to 1654. Balfour says of his transcript: "I had
it out of one little manuscript written with the
hand of Sir John Skene, Clerk Register of Scotland,
copied by him off the principal" (Skene's
period as Lord Clerk Register was 1594-1604) After
Balfour made his copy, both the Skene manuscript and
the "principal" apparently perished,
though there is always a possibility one or both may
re-appear.
However, this Charter (and this copy), has been
subjected to the closest scrutiny and discussion by
mediaeval researchers over the years, and while the
usual small errors occur in the proper names and in
one or two of the latin words, its authenticity
remains unquestioned. All Witnesses have been
identified and placed within the time and locale of
this Charter with the exception of Willelmo, abbot
of Sterling, who, under the name William, still
eludes us.
Earlist printing of this copy was by historian
Sir Robert Sibbald of Fife in 1710. Latest printing
by G.W.S. Barrow, M.A. University College, London,
on page 228 of Volume I, REGESTA REGUM SCOTTORUM,
Acts of Malcolm IV published in Edinburgh, 1960.
Barrow has been engaged in this monumental work of
assembling the Acts of the ancient Kings of
Scotland, for the past ten years under grants of the
Carnegie Trust, and others.
LANDS OF THE DOWRY CHARTER OF 1160
STRATHMIGLO
Strathmiglo Parish in 1160 extended four miles
north and south by four miles in breath, with an
acreage of 9,024. Lying a little less than three
miles from Falkland Parish, which had an acreage of
8,265, it appears from ancient maps that the tracts
joined.
The Miglo River intersects Strathmiglo Parish,
(more recently named the Eden). The soil is rich and
deep. Its land, known first as Casch and later,
around 1225, as Cash, was divided in 1430, and then
referred to as Cash Easter and Cash Wester.
The village of Strathmiglo, begun 1160-61, has
another village called Cashfeus, on the opposite
side of the river, so named because a portion of its
lands was "feued out" about 1785 for
building. Between the two is a level meadow, the
Town Green, a public park.
Wester Cash, in 1485, came under the ownership of
Margaret Malcolm and her husband, John Bykkerton,
and in 1568, John Moncrieff was the tenant of Easter
Cash.
In years past Strathmiglo had a bleach works, and
a linen factory. The economy today centers around
agriculture and livestock raising. It recently won
an award as the cleanest and best kept Village in
the Parish...which seems to say much for the
citizenry of one of the oldest Villages in all
Scotland. This year, 1976, marks its 816th birthday.
KETTLE
Spelled "Cattel" in the Charter, Kettle
derived its name from the Gaelic "Cathel",
meaning 'battlefield'. This must relate to some
great battle fought over its lands before recorded
history, and in all likelihood may have been some of
the action of Mons Graupius in 83 A.D.
Kettle consisted of 7,612 acres when orginally
granted to Duncan/Ada in 1160. Ancient historians
sometimes call it Kings Kettle, simply indicating it
was Crown land and within the King's right to
bestow. Five villages are now on the lands, one, of
course, retaining the name Kettle. We estimate the
population of all five to be around 1500.
RATHILLET
Spelled 'Radhulit' in the Charter, this ancient
property of Duncan/Ada was farm land when they took
ownership in 1160. Today a little Village on the
land bears the name, Rathillet, and consists of 16
houses and a population of 58 people.
In 1670, one David Hackston was heir to the
estates of Rathillet, and it is probably by his name
that Rathillet became stamped on Scotland's history.
Hackston, member of a Convenanter band, had
witnessed the murder of Archbishop Sharp in 1679.
They waylaid his coach at a lonely spot known as
Magus Muir, as he approached his headquarters at St.
Andrews. A year went by before the horseman in the
background, his face covered with his cloak,
identified as Hackston of Rathillet, was tried and
beheaded.
Robert Louis Stevenson, as a boy, rode to the
spot on numerouss occasions with his father. A grim
place, indeed, this clearing in the deep woods. A
large tomb beside the road, wherein, says the
inscription: "Herein lie five men who suffered
martyrdom by their adherance to the Word of
God", and near it, the cairn of Sharp.
It fascinated Stevenson for years afterward. As
he matured and began to write, his manuscripts,
unpublished, reveal that he tried, again and again,
to bring Hackston back with his pen, but failed.
"It is an old temptation with me,"
Stevenson wrote, "to pluck away the cloak, and
see his face, and read his heart."
STRATHBRAAN
Literally, it means 'Valley of the Bran'. These
lands lie in the south Perthshire, along the River
Bran. Perthshire adjoins Fife on the north.
Records are silent as to the extent of this
grant, but if we may judge from the munificance of
the others, it must have been ample.
This land lies where Clan country begins, and
where Clan influences and customs have been a part
of the life of the people for centuries.
Accurate knowledge of when some of our ancient
family first occupied these Perthshire lands remains
obscured. It could have been at the dispersion of
Cash's from Fife in 1424, or it could have been as
early as a son or grandson of our progenitors a
century or more earlier.
But that an ancient Cash did occupy these lands,
establish a family, and leave descendants there is
amply proven by the names of MacCash, MacCasche,
MacCaish, etc., appearing there today, numerous such
spellings as members of the Clan McDonald, even a
place name or two in Gaelic, a ruin, a bridge,
pointing mutely to some ancient Cash.
Research on the Perthshire people still goes on,
and we plan to have a Cash descendant going to
Scotland about mid-year 1976; we hope that a final
attempt to pierce the haze of centuries maybe
successful.
Fife is a "lowland" Parish. Our
progenitors were "lowlanders". Perthshire
is the only penetration of our ancient Cash's into
Clan territory. We are not satisified with the small
'bits' of information we have been able to find.
Almost all vital records before 1700 were either
stolen by the English or destroyed by Reformation
mobs. Both our Immigrant and the Mariner who brought
him here, had left Scotland before this. Parish
officials cannot help, but are cordial, and wish you
well. Our search next will be centered largly along
the Bran River, and you may wish for us that there
maybe a little Abbey that we have not found, one
forgotten by the Reformation.
WITNESSES TO THE DUNCAN-ADA CHARTER --
(1160-1162)
(NOTE: The first witness, Bishop Arnold of St.
Andrews, 'dates' this Charter between Nov. 1160 and
Sept. 1162, which was his term as Bishop)
1. ERNALDO, who was an Abbot at the Abbey of St.
Andrews. St. Andrews would have been some distance
from Edinburgh, but it appears there were always
well known or influential men visiting or in other
business with the King, and they were asked to
witness Acts in preparation at the time.
2. WILLELMO, an Abbot of the Abbey of Struelin,
(Sterling).
3. OSBERTO, an Abbot of the Abbey of Jedburghe.
4. WILLELMO, from the 'fratre regis' after his
name is indicated as a clerk of the King's
household.
5. ADA, Comitissa, is of course the Kings mother,
Ada de Warrene, the wife of Earl Henry. (Adela in
French records)
6. VALTERO, as indicated by the word 'cancellario'
after his name, would be a Chancellor of the Kings
household.
7. GILBERTO, comite de Anegus, is Gilbert, or
Gillebrigde, Earl of Angus. He was of equal rank
with Duncan. They were friends. Gilberto shared with
the Sheriffs of Forfar and Scone the duty of
collecting various Royal funds.
8. RICHARDO de MORUEILL, or Richard de Moreville,
was the Royal Constable of Scotland.
9. ODONELL de UMPHRAWEILL, very probably the son
of Gilbert, Constable of Earl Henry of
Northumberland.
10. RICHARDO COMYNE, also spelled Cumin and Comyn,
was Justice of Scotland about the time of this
Charter, but was getting along in years, and Duncan
became associated with him and continued, after
Comyn's death, as Justice. In all, he was 28 years
in the administration of law. (i.e., Duncan)
11. PHILLIPPO de COLUEILL; little can be found on
this man except that he was "a Baron of
Lanarkshire."
12. VILLIELMO de BURDET, or William Burdet was
Stewart of Malcolm IV nearby Huntington estate.
Other records definitely place him there between
1157 and 1163. This is one method used to check the
authenticity of ancient charters, i.e., to check the
time and place of the witnesses against other
records of the time.
13. MATHEO, signs next. He was the archdeacon of
St. Andrews Abbey, and was most likely at the King's
court at the time in the company of his assistant
Ernaldo, who is the first wirness.
14. NESS, filio comitisse, signs as 'son of the
countess'. He would be the son of the countess and
William, Earl of Leuchars, and other estates of
Fife. He chose in this case to identify himself with
his mother.
15. ORME, filio Hugonis, does just the opposite,
and identifies himself as the son of Hugo, who was a
lay Abbot of Abernethy. Orme was a landowner of some
importance in Fife.
16. ROBERTO de QUINCI, was a Norman. They were
coming into Scotland from England at this time in
considerable numbers. Robert became a Justice of
Scotland under William the Lion, Malcolm IV's
brother, who succeeded him as King in December,
1165.
ANCESTRY OF DUNCAN II, 6th EARL OF FIFE, CASH
PROGENITOR
Duncan MacDuff, who became 1st Earl of Fife with
the accession of Malcolm III, 1057, was born about
1015. He was the great-great-great-great grandfather
of Duncan II, 6th Earl, who married Ada, half-sister
of Malcolm IV in 1160.
No thesis has ever been advanced by historians to
link the 1st Earl to his ancestral heritage,
probably because no recorded link exists. The great
weight of collateral evidence remains either
overlooked, or writers have not had the courage to
advance it.
The 1st Earl was, in our opinion, a
great-grandson of Duff, King of Scots 962-67; a
grandson of King Duff's son, Kenneth MacDuff, who
was King of Scots as Kenneth III 997-1005; and his
father being one of the unknown sons of King
Kenneth.
Only one son of King Kenneth is known, Boedhe.
Boedhe had a son, also unknown, who was murered by
Malcolm II as a youth before he had progeny. Kenneth
also a daughter, Gruoch, who became the mother of
Macbeth.
King Kenneth's other sons are unknown, but it
appears obivious that one of them fathered the man
whose signature on ancient charters names him Duncan
MacDuff, who became 1st Earl of Fife in 1057. 'Mac'
in Scots is 'son of', and the ancestary of this 1st
Fife Earl must by that simple fact go back into the
Duff heritage. He it was whom Shakespeare
immortalized in his Tragedy of Macbeth.
Sir Robert Sibbald, an early Scotch historian,
connects the Gaelic word 'duff' with 'swarthy'. We
may assume that, in ancient days before King Duff,
his ancestors of the Celtic tribe mixed to some
extent with the Greeks and Spaniards as the tribal
migrations moved through these lands, leaving the
mark of black hair and eyes and swarthy skin to
emerge in some families or individuals. Originally,
we probably have here first a term of physical
identity, taken from these physical characteristics,
which later became a surname.
As the ancient Celts came into Scotia in 454, and
mixed with the Picts, who were physically a fair,
red-haired race, likely in the intervening five
centuries to King Duff, the physical characteristics
which had brought about the Duff identity, had
lightened. Coming on down the line to Duncan, 6th
Earl, who married Ada in 1160, we see him with black
hair and eyes, and slightly olive skin, while we
visualize Ada as the fair skinned, blond haired,
blue-eyed Celtic type.
Coming down now from DUFF, King of Scots 962-67,
let's set the line down:
DUFF, King of Scots, 962-67
KENNETH MacDUFF, his son, King of Scots 997-1005
KENNETH's UNKNOWN SON, born ca 990-3
DUNCAN MacDUFF, his son, 1st Earl of Fife born ca
1015
DUFAGEN, his son, 2nd Earl of Fife, born ca 1035
CONSTANTINE, his son, 3rd Earl of Fife, (1107)
died 1127
GILLEMICHAEL, his son, 4th Earl of Fife, (1128)
died 1134
DUNCAN I, his son, 5th Earl of Fife, (1135) died
1154 married Hela
DUNCAN II, his son, 6th Earl of Fife, (1154) died
1204 married Ada
Continuing these lineal descendants of KING DUFF
on down, succeeding Duncan II, 6th Earl and Cash
progenitor, Malcolm was 7th; Malcolm, again, 8th;
Colban (or Colbanus) 9th; another Duncan was 10th;
his son Duncan 11th; and his son, Duncan 12th. The
12th Earl had one child, daughter Isabel, who was
childless, so the Fife Earldom with its lands and
honors passed into history. Their bloodline,
however, like the Scotch thistle, survives and
thrives in those families who inherited it in
Scotland and America.
The 1st Fife Earl, great-great-great-great
grandfather of Duncan, 6th Earl, is, to some
historians, a shadowy figure. He is contradictory;
one Scots Peerage, Balfour-Paul, doubting his very
existence, another, Douglas, lists him without
question as the 1st Earl of Fife. The majority of
Scottish historians from earlist times to the
preseny day agree also that he was.
The ancestral thesis herein is our own, not
before published, and the results of long and
patient study. It has finally been supported,
through the office of the Lord Lyon, Edinburgh, and
its obvious inferences again, and again cautiously,
concurred in by several of Britians top antiquaries.
The fact that the Fife Earls from the first
MacDuff carried a standard of a rampant red lion ON
A GOLD FIELD....a royal standard, and later adopted
by King William as Royal Standard of Scotland, is to
us a matter above doubt or argument.
The rampant red lion of the MacDuff's appears
today, as it has for centuries, on the obverse of
the Town Arms of Cupar, Fife. Anciently the first
Earl's had a hilltop castle there, overlooking the
town, where they resided, administered Fife's
business, and held their courts. Cupar remains today
Fife's 'County Town' (County seat).
We are dealing here with cloudy times in the dark
ages of Scotland. Noble families divided sharply.
Brothers, uncles, nephews killed each other calmly
and efficiently in their quest for power or
inheritance. Murder stalked the throne, and the
families of claimants. The Kings who murdered, and
the men who murdered to succeed them are known in
history because of their crimes.....other than that,
records of the noble families who lived within what
law there was, and were loyal to King and Scotland,
are today almost non-existent.
Malcolm III was crowned at Scone, ten miles north
of what became Cash about a century later, in 1057.
MacDuff, 1st Earl of Fife, undoubtedly seated him on
the inaugural stone, that ancient symbol of Celtic
Kingship used in Eire for centuries, and brought to
Scotia with our Dalriadain Scots in 464. From then
on, Earls of Fife placed succeeding Kings on the
sacred "Stone of Scone", as one of the
hereditary privileges granted them in perpetuity by
Malcolm III.
Both Banner and Arms speak plainly of the royal
ancestry of these Fife Earls....back through Duff,
Malcolm I, Constantine...thence back for centuries
to Conaire Mor, the 'Great Peace King' of Eire who
ruled there in 5 A.D. Both Scottish and English
researchers state that the naming of these Earls --
Constantine, Malcolm, Duncan -- names used also for
the old Celtic Kings, bespeaks this ancestary and
implies a blood relationship. But they have not gone
a step further and linked the line with Duff...nor
with Conaire Mor....and this goes certainly on back
into the shadows of the Himalayan-Egyptian-Milesian-Scot
migrations. These are our ancients. This becomes our
responsibility and our task. There will be
researchers aboard who will sigh with vast relief
that we have offered this thesis, upon which we
stand without reservation, thereby relieving them of
criticism or responsibility.
It becomes clear that our male Cash progenitor,
Duncan II, 6th Earl of Fife, was of the same
ancestral strain as the woman he married, Ada, our
Matriarch, whom Malcolm IVth terms in his dowry
Charter, 'nepto'. Their marriage in 1160 would seem
to have brought together about as pure a
Celtic-Gaelic-Scot bloodline as could have been
produced at that time in Scotland.
Duncan, 6th Earl of Fife, was a Justice of
Scotland for 28 years under both Malcolm IV and his
brother, William "the Lion", who succeeded
him. A Justice (Justiciar) was not solely concerned
with Law, but was a cheif administrative officer for
the King.
COUSIN RELATIONSHIPS OF THE EARLS OF FIFE
THROUGH THE 14th DEGREE
MALCOLM I, KING OF SCOTS
943-54
House of Alpine
DUFF................... Brothers. KENNETH II
King of Scots 962-67 King of Scots 971-95
House of Alpine House of Alpine
KENNETH III 1st Cousins MALCOLM II
King of Scots 997-1005 King of Scots 1005-34
House of Alpine House of Alpine
SON, name unk, 2nd Cousins BETHOC,his daughter
(possibly Duff)b ca 990-3 m Crinan, Abbot of Dunkeld,
had
DUNCAN MacDUFF 3rd Cousins DUNCAN I
1st Earl of Fife King of Scots 1034-40
b ca 1015 House of Alpine
opposed Macbeth & assisted m Sibilla of
Northumberland
Malcolm III to throne of Scots
DUFAGEN 4th Cousins MALCOLM III
2nd Earl of Fife King of Scots 1057-93
born ca 1035 House of Dunkeld m Ingabjord
DONALD III
King of Scots 1093-97
CONSTANTINE 5th Cousins DUNCAN II
3rd Earl of Fife King of Scots Md Ethelthryth
1107 EDGAR
King of Scots 1097-1107
ALEXANDER I
King of Scots Md Sibilla
DAVID I
King of Scots Md Maude
GILLEMICHAEL 6th Cousins HENRY
4th Earl of Fife Son of David I
1128 Md Ada de Warrane
DUNCAN 7th Cousins MALCOLM IV
5th Earl of Fife King of Scotland crowned 1153
1135 Uncle of Ada, Cash matriarch
m Hela WILLIAM I (Wm the Lion)
DAVID, Earl of Huntington
m Matilda of Chester
DUNCAN 8th Cousins ISOBEL
6th Earl of Fife 1154 Dau. of DAVID/Matilda
Justice of Scotland 1172-1200 m Robert de Brus of
Annandale
m Ada, neice of Malcolm IV 3rd Lord of Annandale
(Cash progenitors)
MALCOLM 9th Cousins ROBERT BRUCE
7th Earl of Fife 1204 Son of Isobel/Robert
m Matilda, dau Earl of Stratherne 4th Lord of
Annaandale
Founded Culross Abbey m Isabella de Clare
Neice of William the Lion, had:
MALCOLM 10th Cousins ROBERT BRUCE
8th Earl of Fife 1228 1st Earl of Carrick
Nephew of 7th Earl 6th Lord of Annandale
Grandson of 6th Earl m Marjorie of Carrick, had:|
m Helen, dau Llwellyn
(Prince of Wales)
COLBAN 11th Cousins ROBERT BRUCE
9th Earl of Fife 1266 King of Scots crowned 1306
m Anna Durward m Isabel of Mar & 2nd
Knighted by Alexander III 1264 Elizabeth of Ulster
DUNCAN 12th Cousins DAVID II
10th Earl of Fife 1270 King of Scots
m Johanna de Clare dau of m Joan, sister of King
Edward III
Earl of Gloucester Dau MARJORIE m Walter Stewart
DUNCAN 13th Cousins ROBERT II
11th Earl of Fife 1286 King of Scots
m dau of Earl of Colban Son of Marjorie/Walter
Stewart
m Elizabeth More, had:
DUNCAN 14th Cousins ROBERT III
12th Earl of Fife 1306 King of Scots 1390-1406
m Mary de Monthermer
Neice of Edward I of England
Earl of Fife became extinct in 1353 when the 12th
Duncan died.
NOTES ON PRECEDING PAGE -- EARLS OF FIFE:
Sir Robert Sibbald, in his history of Fife,
published 1710, lists a 13th Earl, as son of the
12th, says he was DUNCAN, married Mary....and died
after 1353. Balfour-Paul in his Scots Peerage says
that Isabella, daughter of the 12th Earl, was his
only child, "as far as is known". This is
probably not going to be resolved, and the majority
of Scottish historians end the line of the Earls,
descending from the DUFF/MacDUFF bloodline, with the
12th Earl.
His daughter Isabella, says Sibbald, recognizing
the above questioned Duncan as her brother, and
13th, succeeded to the 14th in line, and through her
marriages to William Ramsey, Thomas Bisert and
Walter Stuart, they become the 14th, 15th, and 16th
Earls of Fife. Then an indenture made in 1371 by
Isabella, apparently through force or fear, resigns
the Earldom to Robert Stuart (Earl of Mentelth),
brother of her deceased husband Walter, and in it we
note that he takes control of Falkland Castle, its
surrounding forest, etc.
Upon Robert Stuart's death, Murdo (or Murdock),
his son, suceeds as 17th Earl, but is executed in
1424 by James I for crimes against the Earldom and
the King, and at the same time James seizes the
Earldom and its lands and annexes all to the
Scottish Crown. The title, its honors and its power
vanish from history after a tenure of four
centuries.
As mentioned elsewhere in this work, historians
differ on MacDUFF as the 1st Earl of Fife. But the
majority, including Douglas in his Peerage, begin
the line of the Earls with this man, whom they term
only "MacDuff". We discovered his first
name rather accidentally in study of an ancient
Charter.
There is an incident in the life of the 11th Earl
worth repeating: He had a sister, Isabel, wife of
John Comyn, Earl of Buchan. At the time of the
crowning of Robert Bruce as King of Scots in 1306,
the young 11th Earl was in England. So, Isabel rode
to Scone, crowned Bruce and led him to the inaugural
seat, by this act exercising the perogative of the
Fife Earls that had been granted the first Earl by
Malcolm I. Sometime later she was captured by
English soldiery, and King Edward of England
condemned her to an open cage attached to the
outside of Berwick Castle and open to public view.
Here she spent four years. She is typical of many
courageous Scotswomen of those times.
The heart of King Robert Bruce was, by his own
explicit direction, taken by his most trusted
knight, Sir James Douglas, "to be
presented", ordered the King, "to the Holy
Sepulchre where our Lord lay, seeing my body cannot
come there, and wheresoever ye come let it be known
that you carry with you the heart of Robert
Bruce."
Casketed in silver, the heart, in Sir James
constant care, began its journey. But Sir James
never reached Jerusalem. He kept to his ship,
"kept always his behaviour and great triump, as
though he were King of Scots himself, and in his
company were twenty-six young squires and gentlemen
to serve him, his vessels were of gold and silver,
pots, pans, basins, ewers, dishes, flagons, cups.
And all such as would come to see him were served
with wine and divers manner of spices, all people
according to their degree." relates Lord
Berner's English version of the Flemish story, rich
in the lovely prose of the fifteenth century.
Near the Spanish border, Sir James was attacked
by Saracens, and though his party did wonders in
arms, all were slain save William Keith, kept from
the fight by a broken arm. He embalmed Sir James
body, and took it and the heart in its silver casket
back to Scotland, where the heart lies in the Abbey
of Melrose that Bruce had loved.
ADA, CASH MATRIARCH, PARENTAGE &
RELATIONSHIP TO MALCOLM IV
For over 800 years the parentage of Ada, our
matriarch, has been obscured, in that not one
historian has come forward with either discussion or
reasonable speculation. The "nepto" of
Malcolm's dowry Charter is interpreted "neice"
by all early translators. Sir Robert Sibbald in his
1710 History of Fife repeats this, followed by
Leighton, Millar, and later Fife historians. None
objects to the term. Balfour-Paul, in his Peerage of
Scotland, is the first to say: "there have been
objections that Malcolm IV could not have had a
neice of marriageable age by 1160."
He is quite correct. The facts speak for
themselves: Malcolm IV was the eldest son of Henry,
Earl of Northumberland, and Adela de Warrene, and
was born in 1141. His brother, William, "the
Lyon", born 1143, was 17 at the time of Ada's
marriage; brother David, born 1146, was 14 in 1160.
Two sisters, Adela and Margaret, preceded the
brothers, born 1139 and 1140 ca. So it is readily
seen that a meaning of "nepto" as "neice"
is incorrect, and must be abandoned.
There is no record that Adela de Warrene had
married before her marriage to Earl Henry in 1139.
But we have found a meagre manuscript reference that
Henry, Malcolm's father, had children prior to this
marriage, though not one scrap of record exists to
explain, or name the children. Any record of the
progeny of Henry, a son of King David I, would have
been prize booty for pillaging soldiery, and if
there was record, we may assume it went to the
bottom of the Atlantic in the "75
hogsheads". Record of the de Warrene marriage
and children was preserved in France.
It rested squarely upon us to untangle the
parentage of our Matriarch, left in (unreadable
word) for eight centuries. Years of delving led us
only to defeat, record-wise. There was left to us
only the known factors, and these factors, applying
logic and common sense, speak with a clarity and
authority that must be recognized and accepted:
In the first place, the vast land dowry of the
1160 Charter was not one to be given to a distant
relative, such as a cousin. The politics of the dark
ages speak against such action, on this great a
scale, by a King. Malcolm IV gave Ade in marriage to
the ruling noble of Fife, Duncan II, it's 6th Earl
by right of descent, himself actually a petty King
of a goodly portion of Scotland. We find it logical
that Malcolm would give to such a noble in marriage,
a woman of equal rank and prestige. In this case, a
woman of his (Malcolm's) close bloodline.
That Malcolm held great affection for Ada shows
in the scope of the dowry grant. But we must also
consider that some political significance lay
quietly beneath this marriage, through which the
young King was personally assuring himself of the
complete future loyalty of Fife to his Crown. This
factor is nowhere touched upon by historians, but it
must have existed. It is perhaps the most compelling
factor of all that Malcolm placed, in this marriage,
as co-head of Fife's ruling house, a woman of his
own close blood, whose fealty to him would be beyond
question. By this marriage she became Countess of
Fife.
It was such a policy that had won ancient
Pictavia to Scotia; and from Scotia, to the creation
of Scotland. It was deeply ingrained in the Celtic
mind. And while it may be argued that Malcolm IV was
only 19 at Ada's marriage, and perhaps was not
politically mature, older men were about him as
trusted councillors. Certainly this marriage in all
its aspects had been discussed in their councils,
and favorably advanced. It could well be that
Malcolm's grandfather, King David I, as well as his
father, Earl Henry, had expressed approval of such a
match before their deaths.
So, from all this, Ada emerges as the half-sister
of Malcolm IV. Nowhere in ancient times do we find a
term being used in either Celtic or Latin to
describe such a relationship, so it would appear
that the Latin "nepto" of the Charter was
the only term available to the writing scribe to
convey this meaning.
With this decision, we may go back beyond
Scotland now, with confidence, and take the
bloodline into a much older antiquity. Just a
glimpse here: Some years ago we found in a Paris
Museum, a Genealogy which takes David I and his son,
Earl Henry, father of Malcolm IV and Ada, back thru
the ancient Celtic Kings of Ireland, well beyond
1000 B.C. opening the way to a previous era in
Spain, Greece and Egypt....beyond which lies the
formation of the Celtic race in the Himalaya's. This
work, already well researched, has been held pending
a decision on Ada's parentage, now resolved.
Why were Ada's Arms, granted her by Malcolm IV,
King of Scots in 1160, not found in Scotland? Simply
stated, they were stolen by the soldiery of Edward
of England, whose thefts of Scottish land, birth,
marriage, genealogic and heraldic records were
fantastic. At one time Edward had shipped "75
hogsheads" of vital Scottish records to England
by ship. Oliver Cromwell, as Lord Protector of
England about 1656, consigned to Scotland, as a
gesture of good will, the same number of hogsheads
packed with records, but they never reached
Scotland; ship, crew and cargo were lost in a storm
at sea.
Edward simply wanted to make sure, when his time
came to finally crush the stubborn Scots, that he
would have a "blueprint" for the
extermination of the nobles and their descendants.
But he reckoned without Robert Bruce.
Ada's Arms were found in England, ferreted out
and published by James Fairbairn, a Scot, who won
fame for his able work on the heraldry of Great
Britain and Ireland. (A more detailed discussion on
the Arms will be found herein)
Ada and Duncan's Land Grant from Malcolm IVth was
also not found in Scotland, but a copy of the
original grant was found in the British Museum,
London. It had been copied by the Lord Clerk
Register of Scotland "from the original"
and its accuracy has never been questioned. We will
concede that possibly the original was lost in the
great fire of 1700 in Edinburgh...but how and why
Lord Clerk Register Sir John Skene's copy found its
way into the British Museum is an interesting
question. But that it WAS found is the important
factor!
We have come to feel that our Matriarch Ada lived
with her great grandson and family in her declining
years. Certainly she must have dearly love the pink
sandstone castle Duncan had built for her in the
valley of the Miglo, and to which she had come as a
bride in 1160. The wheat waved as of old in the soft
summer wind; the sun sank behind the Lomond Hills in
the same old glory of red and pink.
While Ada's death year is unknown to us, if she
married at 15 in 1160, she would have been 80 when
this great grandson came to maturity. Allow me to
think that she shared this home that had once been
hers, that she loved this great grandson and his
wife, and that before she died, there could have
been for her a golden year or two, in which she
might have cradled in her arms a child or two of
this first House of Cash.
NOTE: Not only Cash and Strathbogie, but Spens,
De Syras, Weems or Wemyss, Duff and Fife are held by
some researchers to be surnames taken by various
descendants of the Earls of Fife. Sir Robert Sibbald
in his History of Fife, published 1710, adds these:
Mackintosh, Toshay (Foshay) and Craigtoun (Craig ?).
ST. ANDREWS CROSS-- the Scottish National Flag,
one of the worlds most ancient banners. This Flag,
as distinguished from the Union Flag, which, from
the Union of the Crowns in 1707 contained the Cross
of St. Andrews, and that of St. George of England,
to which, after union with Ireland in 1801, the
Cross of St. Patrick was added.
The legend of the St. Andrews Cross flag is that
Hungus, King of the Picks, about 750 AD, before a
battle with the Saxons, betook himself in prayer,
and, falling asleep a little before day, dreamed the
Apostle St. Andrew stood beside him and assured him
of victory. He ordered a banner made of the saltire
cross on which the Apostle had been crucified. With
the flag at the head of his army, the Saxons gave
way. From then on, the flag was carried by the Picts,
and after their absorption by the Scots, it was
retained as Scotland's national flag.
ARMS OF ADA, MATRIARCH OF CASH, AS GRANTED HIS
HALF-SISTER BY MALCOLM IVth KING OF SCOTS
ca 1160-61
The Arms shown here, credited to the Cash
surname, (which had been taken in this shortened
form in Fife, Scotland, about 1225 A.D.) were first
listed by James Fairbairn, a Scotch researcher and
heraldic writer, in Vol. I of his great work CRESTS
OF THE FAMILIES OF GREAT BRITIAN AND IRELAND.
Through the years they went through four Editions of
his work, listed, as he found them, without country
of orgin, (page 104) as follows:
CASH, out of a mural coronet or, a garb ppr., and
thereon a bird perched. Plate 153-49.
By 'mural' coronet is meant the markings,
resembling brick, indicating the degree of
relationship of the holder of the Arms to the
Monarch. (The Coronet as a base is only used where
there is such relationship). By 'garb' is indicated
the shock of grain supported by the Coronet. The
bird perched atop the grain is identified as a
martin, which in heraldry is the cadency mark of a
4th son. The 'ppr' indicates 'proper' referring to
proper colors in which the Arms are to be borne --
i.e. brown for the grain shock and the field, gold
for the coronet, against a blue sky. (See note below
in explanation of the 'or')
As we found no record of these Arms at the office
of the Lord Lyon, Edinburgh, Scotland, we knew then
that Fairbairn had found them at the Arms College,
London.
In any event, Fairbairn found the record of these
Arms identified only with the Cash surname, but with
the issuing country, Scotland, deleted. He knew
these were the Arms of a King's relative, and
himself a Scot, suspected their source, but good
reporter that he was, took down the record exactly
as he found it.
He was well aware of the vast number of Arms
records stolen from Scotland by the English
soldiery, copied there, and the orginals, about
1656, assembled by Oliver Cromwell as part of a 75
hogshead shipment of vital records consigned to
Scotland as a good will. Unfortunately ship, crew
and records were lost at sea.
In 1905, Fairbairn's great work, then in its 4th
edition, was 'revised' in England by Laurence
Butters, who was on the Queen's payroll as a
"Seal Engraver, ordinary". The work was
edited by Joseph MacLaren. In this 'revision' the
error occured which merits this discussion: the
ancestral Cash Arms therein are credited to
"England".
We realize that at the time Butters made his
'revision', about 1905, Ireland, Scotland and
England had been for two centuries joined
politically as Great Britian. But certainly when
these ancient Cash Arms were granted in the 12th
century, Scotland had no ties with England, and was
a separate political and ethnic culture. So
crediting these Arms to "England" seems to
have been the arbitrary act of an over-zealous
Englishman on the civil payroll, who simply seized
the opportunity to 'amend' the Cash Arms, which were
lacking a source, by guessing rather than
investigating.
This 1905 Butters/MacLaren 'revision' was copied
in 1911 by the Heraldic Pub. Co., 279 Church St. New
York, and their reprint again copied recently by the
Genealogical Pub. Co. Baltimore, MD. These reprints
are found in libraries in larger cities, and Cashes
who have compared them with the orginial 4th edition
Fairbairn's (of which the title page is shown
herein) have raised many questions. The two reprints
did not research; they simply copied the Butters/MacLaren
work. Responsibility for the Cash error rests
entirely with Butters/MacLaren.
NOTE: The "or" in the above Arms
description is an abbreviation for
Ordinary--Ordinaries, in Heraldry, are the symbol or
"charge" on the sheild, in this case, the
'garb' or shock of grain.
A sketch of the Cash ancestral Arms shown on the
preceding page, was examined in October, 1960, by
Dr. Anthony Wagner of the Arms College, London. I
had sent the sketch to Sir William Cash, of the
English Cash family, and suggested that discussion
with the College might be fruitful. It turned out
that Sir William and Dr. Wagner were long time
personal friends.
Neither in their discussions, nor in subsequent
correspondence from Dr. Wagner, does the College of
Arms make ANY representation that these Cash Arms
are of English orgin.
This is entirely correct -- they are Scotch: This
simply places the Butters/MacLaren
"English" origin for the Cash Arms
incorrect.
While we are discussing the Arms, our
investigation over the past twelve years into
various circumstances surrounding them has developed
a point or two that perhaps we should mention here:
1. Our direct questions as to how the Cash Arms,
as well as copies of the land grant of Malcolm IV to
Duncan/Ada came into England and were found there in
contemporary times, are met with uniformly evasive
replies by English officials.
Without pointing any finger at all, we recall
that John de Baliol, known to history as the puppet
of Edward of England, and rival of Robert Bruce,
(The Robert Bruce mentioned here as rival of John
Baliol, was of course the first Bruce, (or de Brus)
great grandfather of the later King Robert crowned
in 1306.), was King of Scotland, 1248-1315. He and
his associates had carte-blanche to the vital
records of Scotch noble families in registries and
abbeys. His co-operation with Edward's commanders is
well known.
2. The Arms themselves quite clearly tell us
their own story. They should be considered in the
same context with Malcolm IV's land Charter to
Duncan and Ada, included herein. The Coronet is
marked to show the relationship between Ada and the
King. The land Charter granted by Malcolm IV on the
occasion of Ada's marriage to Duncan II, 6th Earl of
Fife, silently confirms the Arms. The shock of grain
on the Arms silently confirms the vast acreage of
wheat land granted by the Charter in Fife and
Perthshire. If they are considered together, they
constitute an authority and an authenticity that is
beyond question.
3. While the surname Cash remained with the Arms
data in England, the origin, or King who granted,
was deleted. Why? Stolen in Scotland and brought to
London probably in the early 1300's, any Englishman
with authority at the court of Edward, would have
stripped this record of King or Scotch origin,
simply because any authority or perogative of a
Scotch King was not to be recognized. (With the
exception, of course, of John de Baliol!)
4. The possibility that the source record of the
Cash Arms, long deleted from their original grant,
(or James Fairbairns would have found and recorded)
may have become utterly lost or destroyed in England
and could not be found at the time Butters wrote in
1905, should be mentioned here. We are not
attempting to excuse guesswork or error... simply
stating that it could have happened.
NOTE: On Jan. 30, 1976, we received from
Genealogical Pub. Co. Baltimore, a Memo stating they
had reprinted the "wrong edition" of
Fairbairns, (by which they must mean the Butter/MacLaren
work of 1905) and that a newer reprint now out is
"correct". We are checking....
5. Vol. 2 of Fairbairn's work reveals a Motto in
connection with the Cash Arms: "Il buono tempo
verra" or "The good time will come."
No Motto is shown on the original Crest as granted
ca 1160. Mottos generally would have been adopted by
later descendants, and this one was probably taken
in the early 1300s.
This Motto is credited to Cash, but is shared on
the Arms of six other families: Gaille, Groombridge,
Hitchens, Hitchins, Hyland and Questeed.
Our interpretation of this is that this Motto was
most likely adopted by the Cash who bore the Arms at
some low point in the fortunes of Scotland. This
could well have been during the first winter after
Robertmap of Europe. Bruce's loyal followers were
less than two hundred. Often in flight from superior
English forces, they hid in glen and heather,
striking out in guerilla fashion, subsisting on
rabbits and venison. But in 1307, as more and more
Scots flocked to his colors, he moved out to begin a
long and harrowing, but eventually successful,
effort to drive the invader back into England.
Fifemen supported Bruce throughout his Kingship,
and gave their lives freely in his cause. To us it
seems entirely reasonable that some young Cash, a
Fifeman and a Baron, who bore these Arms, a fourth
son of his (of Cash), and in some way which history
does not reveal, rendered to the young Baron and to
Bruce's cause, service above and beyond the call of
duty. He could, insuch case, confer his Motto taken
under circumstances of this kind, upon retainers.
(A Baron is anciently defined as one with the
right to eat at the King's table. Certainly Cash's
of the ancient noble family enjoyed this right.)
6. The Cash Arms have survived many trials in the
816 years since they were granted by Malcolm IV of
Scotland to his niece (half-sister), Ada.
But we now know their true source: the King who
granted them, the woman who bore them and passed
them to her descendants, their meaning, and their
times.
These things endure unchanged, like a block of
granite. And for their integrity and their
preservation, let our thanks be given to the
Almighty.
THE TAKING OF THE SURNAME CASCHE-CASH
As we come to the time when the descendants of
Duncan and Ada, probably grandson and great
grandson, first took the surname Casche, we are
within a period almost barren of record. But we do
know that Duncan and Ada had these four children, as
confirmed by Balfour-Paul's Peerage of Scotland:
1. MALCOLM who succeeded his father, was 7th Earl
of Fife, died 1228, leaving no issue.
2. DUNCAN who married "the lady Aliz Corbet",
daughter of Walter Corbet of Makerstoun. Their
progeny is unknown, except for son Malcolm, who is
known because he became 8th Earl of Fife.
3. DAVID who got from his father Duncan the lands
of Strathbogie, and whose son, John, took his
surname from these lands as John de Strathbogie.
4. DAUGHTER name unknown, who married, about
1188, the son of Roger de Merlay.
The mark of cadency on Ada's Arms, the 'martlet'
or baby martin atop the wheat shock, is the mark of
a 4th son. And while no record exists of who he was
or of what generation, the thought persists that he
was of the 4th generation, or a great grandson of
the progenitors, Duncan/Ada. In such case, from
their marriage in 1160, the martlet tells us the
Arms of record were borne about 1225. Under these
circumstances, the bearer was likely about 22,
married, head of a house in his own right, and
probably using the shortened surname, Cash, as his
Arms, when finally the record saw the light of day
in 1898, are credited to Cash.
The fact that no record or public printing of
these Arms exists from the time of their issuance ca
1160-61, to the time of Fairbairns Crests, published
in 1898, well supports the premise of their theft,
removal to England, and their suppression from
public knowledge for the intervening centuries. This
pilferage likely occured between 1225 and the Battle
of Bannockburn, 1314.
In seeking the house who first adopted the Casche
surname, we eliminate Malcolm, #1 above, who left no
issue. Also David, #3, whose son took the surname
Strathbogie from their lands. Also a daughter, #4,
who took the name of her husband, de Merlay. We are
led therefore clearly to Duncan, #2 above, and his
descendants. And, just as the descendants of his
brother David took their surname from their lands,
it is apparent that
Duncan's descendants took theirs from their home
castle, Caschel, which is gaelic. Actually, Casche
may have been the name of the castle lands even
before the family took it as a surname. The Chair of
History of the venerable University of St. Andrews,
22 miles from the lands, supports this thesis when
it states: "The lands of Casche are of
considerable antiquity, and seem to have been known
from the 12th century."
So very possibly, during Duncan's generation, (#2
above) this gaelic term for the Castle, may have
been used by him to designate both land and castle,
perhaps as early as 1190. He may first have used it
as an extra identity...perhaps signing himself
before his fathers death in 1204: "Duncano
filio comes" or Duncan, son of the Earl, then
after his fathers death, perhaps "Duncano de
Casche" Duncan of Casche.. It is in such ways
and by the passage of time, that surnames became
affixed to families and endured.
It is a reasonable assumption that the Duncan (#2
above) who married Aliz Corbet, may himself have
dropped the 'l' from the gaelic Caschel, and that
their sons were born to the surname Casch or Casche.
Their only recorded son, Malcolm, became 8th Earl of
Fife, and having this identity, took no surname. It
appears logical that another son of Duncan/Corbet,
born as Casch or Casche, on reaching maturity,
dropped the 'c' and the 'e', in the common practice
of spelling a word phonetically as it sounded, and
in this case, pronunciation remained the same. His
son's bring us into the 4th generation from Duncan/Ada,
and obviously the forth son bore the Arms, as they
came into record bearing a fourth son's cadency
mark, a martlet, or young martin.
So based on the recorded Arms, this son who bore
the surname in its shortened form, brought into
being, by right of birth, the first House of Cash,
in the period, as closely as can be estimated, of
1225 A.D.
SEIZURE AND DISPERSION - 1424
John (Stewart) Earl of Carrick, became King of
Scotland in 1390, succeeding his father Robert II.
He chose to rule under the name Robert III, rather
than John. He was 50, in frail health, and crippled
by the kick of a horse in his youth, his vitality
not equal to that of his arrogant nobles, he
entrusted much of the government to his brother,
Robert Stewart, which proved an unwise course.
In 1398 Robert III created his eldest son, David,
age 21, Duke of Rothesay, and the King's brother,
Robert, he named to be Duke of Albany. This was the
first creation of "Dukes" in Scotland. The
ambition of Rothesay and the jealousy of Albany
resulted in Rothesay's death at Falkland Castle,
which Albany then occupied. It was said he died of
dysentery, but the circumstances were suspicious. He
was quickly and secretly buried. The public accused
Albany of murder; but, lacking evidence, he was
acquitted.
Meanwhile, Robert III sent his only remaining
son, James, to France, fearing for his safety, but
enroute he was captured by the English, taken to
London and imprisoned. The old King did not long
survive these tragedies, and died by 1407. The Scots
parliament continued Albany his brother as Regent,
with the prior declaration that James, now captive
in England, was their lawful King.
Albany tried to prevent the return of the young
King of Scotland. Albany died in 1419, and with
James being still a captive, Albany's son, Murdoch
Stewart, succeeded as Duke of Albany, Earl of Fife
and Regent of Scotland. A cold, cunning and selfish
man, ill-fitted for these posts, Scotland shortly
became a scene of anarchy, treason and confusion.
The Earl of Douglas now negotiated with King
Henry of England for James' return, and finally a
ransom was arranged, paid by the Scots, and in 1424
James, with his Queen, Johanna, whom he married in
England, returned to Scotland. Murdoch, exercising
the perogative of the Earls of Fife, placed him on
the inaugural stone.
Determined to punish those responsible for his
detention in England, and for the muddled state of
the Scotch government, he quickly arrested Murdoch
Stewart at Perth, together with his wife, youngest
son Alexander Stewart, his oldest son Walter, his
aged father-in-law the Earl of Lennox, and some
twenty six other barons and noblemen whom history
does not name. The heaviest blow fell on the House
of Fife, as Murdoch, Earl of Fife, had been Regent
also, and though they were James' own kinsmen, the
King had evidently decided to "strike down the
tall weeds first".
Murdoch Stewart, his two sons, and his
father-in-law, were publicly executed at Stirling.
The Earldom of Fife, "with all its lands,
manors and castles"... Strathmiglo, Kettle,
Rathillet, Falkland....were now seized and forfeited
to the Crown. The castle at Falkland, which had
housed the later Earls of Fife, now became a Royal
palace. Naturally the lands of Cash and the castle
at Strathmiglo were included in the seizure, because
they had been originally chartered to a Earl of
Fife. The other noblemen were now liberated.
So the old and lovely dream that had been Ada's
and Duncan's in 1160, had now, after 263 years, come
'full circle' to its end. Through suspicion,
avarice, jealousy and lust for power, men had died,
and the lands first granted in 1160 by Malcolm IVth
had returned to the Scottish Crown. Our ancients who
had occupied them were now without a home, their
prestige severely damaged, perhaps in some circles
even unwelcome in Scotland!
Our Cash ancients at Strathmiglo were victims of
circumstances arising when the lineal descent from
MacDuff ended with the childless Isabel, and the
Earldom through her three childless marriages, was
devolved upon Robert Stewart, brother of her second
husband, Walter Stewart.
Murdoch Stewart, Regent and Earl of Fife in 1424,
seems a thorough rogue. The Strathmiglo Cashes lived
under his pernicious system of bribery, extra
taxation, and all the ills of a dishonest public
official, to none of which they agreed, and for none
of which they were responsible. Suddenly what had
been a tranquil, happy barony, was, through, Murdoch
and his father before him, made into an object of
the King's wrath simply because it lay within the
Fife earldom.
Our people at Strathmiglo, after 263 years of
occupancy, with close relationships to the Crown of
Scotland, showing always a fierce nationalism for
which they had died on many fields, and in support
of Bruce, were far too aware of their own and
Scotland's interests to co-operate with a rogue, or
even to render lip-service toward keeping their
rightful King, seed of their beloved Bruce, in
English bondage.
Murdoch as Regent had visited Strathmiglo in
1420, and our people at the castle naturally gave
him welcome at that time because he represented the
government. He signed a document there, dating it
"at the Castle of Stramyglo". Even this
simple act of hospitility may have been recorded and
later misjudged.
The end of these dark days had not been reached
quiet yet, as the pestilence entered Scotland in
1430, called dourly by the Scots "the black
death of the English", and it raged for three
years unchecked while countless thousands died. How
many Cash's succumbed to it can only be conjectured:
it is possible only their various migrations saved
some family units. That they survived in Ireland we
know, as a few are there today, and we have record
of Cash immigrants to this country in the late
1600's and early 1700's. That some went to clan
country, and survived there, is proved by their
presence there today, with the addition of the
"Mac" traditional to that area, as
MacCasche and MacCash. That they survived in
Bohemia, southern Germaney, is indicated by a sparse
showing of the surname there with the germanic
"K" as Kash or Kasche, and by immigrants
who came to this country in the 1700's. some
retaining the K, others reverting to the traditional
Cash. They survived in England, as some had gone
there from Scotland as early as 1300, quite a few of
the traditional surname appear there today, and we
have record of immigrant's as Cash as early as 1675.
Now, at Perth, where Duncan and Ada married in
1160, and probably received their land charter from
Malcolm IVth, and where Murdoch and his son's were
arrested in 1424, James I, King of Scots is murdered
there in February, 1436, leaving a baby son.
Scant record is left of all this unhappy
business, but through it all moves a sinister
figure, who stays discreetly behind the scenes. It
is Walter, Duke of Atholl, who is, by blood, just
one step from the throne....that step is James's
baby son, and the middle ages has a way of dealing
with such small handicaps! It was Atholl who
encouraged James to strike down the Fife House,
feeling that their vengeance would remove James I.
It was he, it is said, who planned the Kings murder,
and had even had a hand in the murder of young
Rothesay.
Atholl was indeed near the throne; so Queen Joan
crowned him, after James' death, with a paper
crown...but the head was without body.
And as the curtain rings down on this, one of the
sorrier spectacles of Scottish history, Ada's
banner, the wheat on the Coronet, which had had
meaning and power in Fife for nearly three hundred
years, hung impotent in the fitful and forboding
wind of the times.
But Duncan's, the red lion on a gold field,
continued to snap impudently at the Cupar in Fife,
and apparently none of the King's minions thought to
take it down! So the Arms of one of our progenitor's
remain on the Scottish scene as the obverse of the
Borough Arms of Cupar....Ancient seat of the early
Earls, probably since MacDuff, where they had a
castle on a hill overlooking the town, where they
administered Fife's business, and held their courts.
It is today the 'County Town' of Fife.
The surname is scarce in Scotland today. Whether
upon death of James I in 1436, Cashes returned to
Fife, no record remains, but it seems doubtful. That
they returned to a province other than Fife, perhaps
near the coast, seems more probable. William, the
Salem mariner, who brought our Immigrant to these
shores, was born in Scotland about 1625, province
unknown. The Immigrant, also William, born there
about 1650...and this
in spite of King, Plague and Dispersion! If you
have ever tried to eradicate a thistle, you will
realize why the Thistle is Scotland's Badge!
(Thistles are symbolic of one of the most ancient
orders of knighthood; the Scottish Order of the
Thistle.)
THE MARINER, WILLIAM CASH, OF SALEM
In order that the reader of the next page will
not be confused, an explanatory note seems required
here:
William Cash, Mariner, was born in Scotland about
1625, settled in Salem, Massachusetts, around 1667,
where he married Elizabeth Lambert, raised his
family, and died there in 1690.
This William was owner and master of the
Brigantine, "Good Intent", was most likly
a master mariner by the time he was 24, and operated
his ship in the British Isles and American colonies
trade for about forty years.
Perhaps as early as 1672-3 the Mariner brought to
Salem his nephew, also William Cash from Scotland,
who is listed as 'seated' in Westmoreland county,
Virginia in 1677-- in a British Tax List. He was the
immigrant ancestor of our American Cash family. This
William also married an Elizabeth, though her
surname still eludes us (it may have been Skinner).
These two William's, both with wives named
Elizabeth, have caused researchers considerable
confusion. Some attempt to name the Mariner as the
Cash Immigrant, "from whom all of the name in
America descended" but when they come to
connect the Virginia family, they find they cannot
do so. It is at this point that they realize they
are two separate and probably from the same orgin in
Scotland. Descendants of the Mariner are mainly
concentrated along the New England seaboard,
Massachusetts, Maine, Connecticut, and by the middle
1800's in New York state. (The Salem Archivist knew
nothing of the younger William Cash who had passed
through Salem on his way to Virginia, apparently).
The unique situation here is that there is little
doubt but what the Mariner and our Immigrant were
Uncle/Nephew, making the New England group our close
"kin" ...but due to the destruction of
vital records in Scotland, we have been unable to
document what we so sincerely believe.
The Salem Mariner left in Salem archives, later
appearing in the published Genealogy of
Massachusetts, the fact that the Cash seat was
anciently at "the place Cash, in Strathmiglo,
Fife, Scotland" and by this very circumstance
he became ours, because this, too, is the seat of
the ancient orgin of the Cash family to which we
belong, the marriage of our progenitors, the taking
of the surname, and the granting of the ancient
Land's and Arm's.
At this point we can only hope that in time some
documentary evidence may be discovered which will
definitley unite these two groups.
England has a large group of Cashes also, with
whom we are in touch, and they are working on their
genealogical orgin's. It appears this group may have
been founded by a Scot of our ancient family who
came into Cheshire area of England before 1300.
We mention also here a quite large group of
Cash's springing from the Salem Mariner, whose Cash
spelling was apparently diverted to Kash by a German
clerk in an early Virginia land deed, then carried
down by descendants in that spelling. Many of these
are located in Kentucky.
Another group presently in the Dakota's sprang
from the ancient family who, at the dispersion of
1424, went to Bohemia in southern Germany, and here
also the germanic K was affixed to them. Some
descendants of this group, unaware of the Scotch
tradition, came here as Kash, some as Kasch and
others, having retained the tradition, as Cash.
"THE PLACE CASH" to which the Mariner,
William Cash, of Salem, refers in stating where the
surname was taken, was the castle grounds and
establishment, as set apart from the farm land
surrounding it in the valley of the Miglo River, as
granted to Duncan and Ada in her dowry charter of
1160.
The Castle, byers (barns), fortalice or defense
tower, an armorer or smith's shop, houses for
servants and retainers, a small mill for weaving and
making cloth, an archery range, enclosures and sheds
for cattle, poultry, horses and sheep--etc, it was a
substantial establishment, probably occuping about
200 acres.
Not only did a great grandson of Duncan and Ada
adopt the family surname from the gaelic word
meaning castle, caschel, but the surname, as was
usual in those times, became associated with the
land of the castle, also. By about 1225 AD, perhaps
earlier, we know these acres were called "the
lands of Casche", and after another century
were referred to in the short form as the
"lands of Cash". These lands were divided
about 1775, and are known today as Cash Easter and
Cash Wester.
The village of Strathmiglo, its center now about
3/4ths of a mile from the old location of the
castle, began in 1161 from the crude sod huts of the
first workmen on the Castle. (Strath, in Scots, is
valley, the Miglo is the little river which still
flows thru it)
"OF ENGLISH AND SCOTCH ORIGIN", said
William of Salem, in speaking of the Cash family,
and this he did in all sincerity, because he belived
it to be so, and the English connections of our
early Scotch ancestors seemed to support such a
connection. There was, however, no Cash 'origin' as
such in England. There were only various marriages
between our ancients and Englishwomen, which was to
be expected; Fife was a noble house, enjoyed close
contact with the Scots throne, and several of the
later Fife Earls, with more political interest than
fealty in Scotland, leaned toward the English King,
and some married his relatives and women of his
court...but these were not of the Duncan/Ada line,
though "kin". These alliances, as they
came on down in the traditions of the old family,
perhaps garbeled and misunderstood generation to
generation, could easily have fostered, by the
1600's when William was born and growing to manhood,
the idea that the family beginnings were in part
English. William thought it was fact, or he would
not have so stated; actually, it simply was not
fact.
The marriages that contributed to this
misconception were most likely that of Malcolm III,
(1057-93) to Margaret, sister of Eadgar, who was
briefly England's King. This alliance was about a
century before the time of Malcolm IVth, our Ada's
Uncle.
After Malcolm's time, within the House of Fife,
we find the 8th Earl, also named Malcolm) marrying
Helen, the daughter of Llewellyn, Prince of Wales.
Duncan, 10th Earl, married Johanna de Clare,
daughter kof Gilbert de Clare, the English Earl of
Gloucester.
Duncan, 12th Earl, married Mary de Monthermer,
daughter of Ralph, Lord Monthermer, and
granddaughter of King Edward I of England. They had
one daughter, Isabel, who succeeding him in lands
and honors, was childless, and the Fife Earldom
passed into other hands. Duncan, 12th Earl, was the
last Earl in male descent from the old chief,
MacDuff. (some say Mary was Maria, and was niece of
King Edward Ist)
Meanwhile the descendants of Duncan, 6th Earl of
Fife, and Ada, our progenitors, had gone on
undisturbed and unaffected by these alliances,
Duncan and Ada having fused together in their
marriage about as pure a Celtic-Gaelic-Scot
bloodline as could have been produced in 1160. They
lived and died in Scotland. Duncan and Ada's son,
Duncan, married the daughter of a Scot, in Scotland,
and that his grandchildren, who first took the
Casche surname about 1225 at Strathmiglo were Scots
of this blood, and certainly spoke Gaelic, is
obvious.
There is however, one thing to be said for these
English alliances: they seemed to throw a magical
protection around this home Castle, and this family,
whose dynasty endured for 263 years, while the
incursions and attacks of the English troops swirled
around them, and Castle's as close as eight miles
from Strathmiglo were leveled, seem to have gone
undisturbed, their Castle unscathed.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The Dalriadian Scots...who were they? In very
ancient times, Ireland was called Scotia, and its
people Scots. This probably began around 1000 BC at
the time when Irish oral history cites the coming
from Egypt, (via Spain) of Scota, widow of Miles, or
Mileaius, and her sons. They landed, says the
honored legend, in Bantry Bay, and their ships
carried horses, chariots, and loyal followers. They
conquered the barbarian Firbolg, divided Eire
between the sons, and the descendants of the sons
supplied Eire's Kings for many centuries.
You will note on your present day map of Ireland,
in the south, a place called Cashal. (no connection
to our surname origin, merely Irish Gaelic for
Castle). Cashal was the seat of the ancient Kings of
Munster. Some of its orginial ruins are still
preserved. About 462 AD a son of one of these Kings,
Cairbre Riada, led a group of followers north, to
escape famine. He was a popular and competent
leader, as they named themselves the Dal (gaelic for
Clan) Riada, and history from then on refers to them
as the Dalriadian Scots.
Arriving in the north, a group of 150 of them
decided to cross the Channel into Alba (ancient
Scotland) and colonize. This was 464 AD. The
adventurers were headed by Fergus Mor, the 131st
Monarch of Ireland, who became first King of these
Dalriadians who were to found what was to become
first Scotia, then Scotland.
With Fergus was his grandson, Conal Gabhrain (or
Gabran) who in 538 would be King of the Dalriadian
group. Scots chroniclers mention him as a direct
lineal ancestor of Malcolm IV who would be
half-brother to our Matriarch, Ada, in 1160; This
translated to the fact that the ancient Cash
bloodline was actually a part of the migratory
movement that founded Scotland.
Twelfth Century Scotch chronicles refer to six
Scottish Kings as "the seed of Conaire Mor"
in referring to their genealogy back thru the
ancient Kings of Ireland: Alexander I 1107-1124,
David I 1124-1153, Malcolm IV 1153-1165, William the
Lyon 1165-1214, Alexander II 1214-1249, and
Alexander III 1249-1286. As we trace the ancestary
of these Scottish Kings, they lead us into the dim
corridors of oral history, back to Heremon, Eire's
first King, (son of Milesius) and beyond 1000 BC.
We found preserved in a Paris museum, a
manuscript of the genealogy of Malcolm IV and
William, his brother, taking their bloodlines back
through Fenius Fairsaith, a King of Scythia, c 1300
B.C. thence back to Gomer, and his father, Noah.
Then in Dublin, the irrepressible Irish go a step
further, taking Malcolm IV and William beyond Noah,
through Noah's ancestors, Lamech, Methuselah, Enoch,
Jared, Mahaleel, Cainan, Enos, Seth and Adam! The
archives of Ireland are rich in chronicle and
manuscript history, preserved from an earlier time
than that of any other country in Europe.
Beyond the earliest periods above mentioned in
recorded and/or oral history, we come to a period
which began roughly 30,000 years before Christ,
which takes us into the Himalaya's, where the white
Celtic race was formed in approximatley a ten
thousand year entrapment by glacial ice, and in this
period de-pigmented from the basic brown Aryan 'root
stock' from which came Celts, Mediteranneans and
Nordics in varying degrees of White, light and
olive. As the glaciers ebbed and the passes opened,
these people came into the plains of Iran and
Afghanistan and into Egypt, and as the milleniums
passed, plodded their many tortuous ways across the
European continent.
The site of our racial formation lies, roughly,
in what appears on todays maps as Ladakh, among some
of the worlds highest peaks, but within a hundred
mile long valley region fed by lakes with warm
springs as their source, which nurtured and
sustained the primordial, animal and marine life of
the region. The area, now in Communist hands, may be
long closed to further research.
San Diego, California sig DLC
May 8th, 1973
Amended Jan 24, 1976
|